The Exam Problem: Two-Loop DC Network
If you are studying for your first circuits exam or brushing up on DC network theory, you will inevitably encounter the two-loop resistive network. It is the foundational benchmark for testing your grasp of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL). Unlike simple series-parallel reductions, this topology forces you to write and solve simultaneous linear equations.
Below is a classic exam-style problem. We will use Mesh Analysis (which is KVL applied to closed loops) because the circuit has two distinct windows (meshes) and only two essential nodes. While Nodal Analysis (KCL) would also work, mesh analysis is generally faster for planar circuits with fewer voltage sources than current sources.
Consider a planar DC circuit with two loops sharing a central branch.
• Left Branch: Contains a 14V DC voltage source (V1, positive terminal at the top) in series with a 2Ω resistor (R1).
• Middle Branch: Contains a single 4Ω resistor (R2).
• Right Branch: Contains a 6V DC voltage source (V2, positive terminal at the top) in series with a 2Ω resistor (R3).
Task: Calculate the exact magnitude and physical direction of the current flowing through the shared middle resistor (R2). Show all work.
Step-by-Step Solution: Mesh Analysis via KVL
Before touching a calculator, we must define our mesh currents and identify the primary trap in this specific topology.
Step 1: Define Mesh Currents
Assign a clockwise mesh current to each independent loop. Let I1 be the clockwise current in the left mesh, and I2 be the clockwise current in the right mesh. By convention, we assume all currents flow clockwise; if our final math yields a negative number, the physical current simply flows counter-clockwise.
Step 2: Write KVL for Mesh 1 (Left Loop)
Start at the bottom-left corner and walk clockwise around the left loop. We sum the voltage rises and drops to zero.
- We go from negative to positive across V1: +14V (Wait, standard KVL sum of drops = 0. Let's use the sum of voltage drops = 0 convention).
Walking clockwise: We hit the negative terminal of V1 first, so it's a rise. -14V. - We walk through R1 in the same direction as I1: Voltage drop = + I1 × 2Ω.
- We walk through R2 downwards. I1 goes down, but I2 goes up through R2. The net current in the direction of our walk is (I1 - I2). Voltage drop = + (I1 - I2) × 4Ω.
Equation 1:
-14 + 2(I1) + 4(I1 - I2) = 0
-14 + 2I1 + 4I1 - 4I2 = 0
6I1 - 4I2 = 14
3I1 - 2I2 = 7 (Divided by 2 for simplicity)
Step 3: Write KVL for Mesh 2 (Right Loop)
Start at the bottom-right corner and walk clockwise around the right loop.
- We walk through R2 upwards. The net current in the direction of our walk is (I2 - I1). Voltage drop = + (I2 - I1) × 4Ω.
- We walk through R3 in the same direction as I2: Voltage drop = + I2 × 2Ω.
- We walk through V2 from positive to negative (top to bottom). This is a voltage drop in the direction of our walk: +6V. (This is where V2 acts as a load, absorbing power).
Equation 2:
4(I2 - I1) + 2(I2) + 6 = 0
4I2 - 4I1 + 2I2 + 6 = 0
-4I1 + 6I2 = -6
-2I1 + 3I2 = -3 (Divided by 2 for simplicity)
Step 4: Solve the Simultaneous Equations
We now have a clean 2x2 linear system:
1) 3I1 - 2I2 = 7
2) -2I1 + 3I2 = -3
Multiply Equation 1 by 3, and Equation 2 by 2 to eliminate I2:
9I1 - 6I2 = 21
-4I1 + 6I2 = -6
Add the two equations together:
(9I1 - 4I1) + (-6I2 + 6I2) = 21 - 6
5I1 = 15
I1 = 3 Amps
Substitute I1 back into Equation 1:
3(3) - 2I2 = 7
9 - 2I2 = 7
-2I2 = -2
I2 = 1 Amp
Step 5: Determine the Target Current
The problem asks for the current through the shared middle resistor, R2. Because we defined both I1 and I2 as clockwise, they oppose each other in the middle branch. I1 pushes down, I2 pushes up.
I_R2 = I1 - I2 = 3A - 1A = 2 Amps.
Since the result is positive, the net physical current flows downwards through R2.
Sanity Check & Power Verification
Never hand in an exam paper without an independent verification. In circuit theory, we use Tellegen's Theorem, which states that the total power supplied by sources must exactly equal the total power absorbed by the passive components and any loads. This proves our algebra is physically sound.
First, let's establish the power absorbed by the resistors using P = I²R:
| Component | Current (A) | Resistance (Ω) | Power Absorbed (W) |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 3 A (I1) | 2 Ω | 3² × 2 = 18 W |
| R2 | 2 A (I1-I2) | 4 Ω | 2² × 4 = 16 W |
| R3 | 1 A (I2) | 2 Ω | 1² × 2 = 2 W |
| Total Resistor Dissipation | 36 W | ||
Now, evaluate the sources. V1 is sourcing current out of its positive terminal, so it supplies power: P_V1 = 14V × 3A = 42W supplied.
What about V2? Mesh current I2 (1A) flows clockwise, meaning it enters the positive terminal of V2. When current enters the positive terminal of a source, that source is absorbing power (acting like a battery being charged). P_V2 = 6V × 1A = 6W absorbed.
The Balance Check:
Total Power Supplied = 42W
Total Power Absorbed = 36W (resistors) + 6W (V2) = 42W.
Supplied equals absorbed. The order of magnitude is correct (amps, not microamps), the units resolve to Watts, and the algebra is verified.
Frequently Asked Questions About Kirchhoff's Law Practice Problems
What is the most common mistake students make in Kirchhoff's law practice problems?
Beyond basic algebra errors, the most frequent point of failure is violating the passive sign convention when writing KVL equations, specifically on shared components or opposing voltage sources. Students often write the voltage drop across a shared resistor as just I × R, forgetting to subtract the opposing mesh current. Another massive trap is treating a voltage source that is being "back-fed" (like V2 in our walkthrough) as a supplier of power rather than a load, which ruins the final power balance check.
Should I use KCL (Nodal Analysis) or KVL (Mesh Analysis) for DC circuits?
The choice depends entirely on the circuit topology. Use Mesh Analysis (KVL) when the circuit has fewer independent loops (meshes) than essential nodes, or when the circuit is rich in voltage sources. Use Nodal Analysis (KCL) when the circuit has fewer essential nodes than loops, or when it is rich in current sources. As a rule of thumb for exam settings: count the meshes and count the nodes (minus one for the ground reference). Pick the method that yields the smaller system of linear equations.
How do I handle independent current sources when doing mesh analysis?
Current sources actually make mesh analysis easier, provided you know the trick. If a current source exists on the outer boundary of a single mesh, it immediately defines that mesh current (e.g., if a 5A source is on the left edge of Mesh 1, then I1 = 5A). If a current source is shared between two meshes, you must create a "Supermesh" by enclosing both meshes in a larger loop, bypassing the current source for the KVL walk, and then writing a separate KCL constraint equation at the current source node (e.g., I1 - I2 = 5A).
Where can I find more advanced Kirchhoff's law practice problems with AC components?
Once you master DC resistive networks, the exact same KVL and KCL rules apply to AC circuits, but you must transition from scalar algebra to complex phasor math. Resistors become impedances (Z), and your currents and voltages are represented as complex numbers (magnitude and phase angle). Look for university-level "AC Steady-State Analysis" problem sets. The algebraic setup is identical to the walkthrough above, but you will need a scientific calculator capable of complex number matrix inversion to solve the final equations.






